March 26, 2017

May 1, 2012

Anti-Israel Forces Suffer Defeat at Methodist General Conference

I wasn’t able to get to this over the weekend, but it seems there were big doings on Israel at the United Methodists’ General Conference on Saturday. The divestment movement, at least temporarily, was derailed.

The call for divestment had been submitted by half a dozen annual conferences and the General Board of Church and Society. Here’s what it wanted:

The 2012 General Conference calls on The United Methodist Church to end its financial involvement in Israel’s occupation by divesting from companies that sustain the occupation. The 2012 General Conference:

•instructs all United Methodist general boards and agencies to divest promptly from Caterpillar, Motorola Solutions, and Hewlett Packard until they end their involvement in the Israeli occupation. These companies have been engaged repeatedly by the United Methodist general agencies, boards and annual conferences on this issue.

•calls on all United Methodist general boards and agencies to immediately engage with other companies in their portfolios that have been identified by researchers in United Methodist general boards and agencies and annual conferences as being involved in the occupation….If these companies do not change their involvement within two years, they should be removed from United Methodist portfolios.

Here’s what that was changed to:

The 2012 General Conference calls on the General Board of Pensions and Health Benefits to explore serious peacemaking strategies in Israel and Palestine including positive economic and financial investment in Palestine.
•Asks that all United Methodist general boards and agencies prayerfully consider advocating that all companies formally recognize and adopt into their Codes of conduct the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (also known as the Ruggie Principles) and that the boards and agencies prayerfully consider economic sanctions with companies that refuse to recognize and adopt the Principles.

This change was approved 37-36, and is a significant defeat for the anti-Israel forces. The Church and Society committees at a General Conference generally rubber-stamp whatever the GBCS wants, the real test coming on the floor of the GC. For Jim Winkler and his pals to lose in the committee suggests that their approach will also be rejected by the Conference as a whole. Interestingly enough, neither of the most prominent outside meddlers in Methodist affairs on this issue (the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and Jewish Voice for Peace) has had anything to say about it. Nor have I been able to find anything from United Methodist Kairos Response or their allies at the PCUSA’s Israel Palestine Mission Network. There’s plenty going on behind the scenes, I’m sure, and I’ll let you know about it as soon as it becomes public.

UPDATE: On another but related note, the IPMN has linked on its Twitter site to a borderline anti-Semite named Ben White, writing at one of IPMN’s favorite sites, Electronic Intifada. White makes the mistake of taking on one of the blogosphere’s finest Zionist voices, Elder of Ziyon, who proceeds to take him apart, and in the process expose the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement for what it truly is. IPMN’s link says: Apartheid apologists respond to BDS with fake concern for Palestinians.” EofZ makes clear just how much of a case of projection this is.

UPDATE: Institute on Religion and Democracy writer Jeff Walton reports that the General Conference will be voting on this item at today’s plenary session. More to come.

UPDATE: Turns out they’ve postponed the divestment vote until tomorrow.

Share this story:

Recent Related Posts



Hey, this looks like fun. Let me try. Ahem:

The 2012 General Conference calls on certain irritant factions and persons within The United Methodist Church to end their frequent attempts to politicize our church by trying to drag it into an affair of foreign national security. Israel’s defense of its own country (called ‘occupation’ by said irritants) is neither the business of the 2012 General Conference nor the concern of The United Methodist Church. If said irritants do not cease their attempted politicization of our church, they will lose their portfolios, their safe employment within UMC, and they will be reduced to bottomfeeders who can only get a job by occupying someone else’s.

[1] Posted by All-Is-True on 5-1-2012 at 10:15 AM · [top]

All-Is-True—Would you let me redraft and see if I can get it submitted as an overture to the 2012 PCUSA General Assembly coming up in a couple of months?

[2] Posted by Jim the Puritan on 5-1-2012 at 09:26 PM · [top]

Jim the Puritan: Of course! wink

[3] Posted by All-Is-True on 5-2-2012 at 07:38 AM · [top]

Briliant, #1.

[4] Posted by Jeffersonian on 5-2-2012 at 09:09 AM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.