May 19, 2013

July 22, 2012


UPDATED: News services report Paterno statue gone; PSU to suffer “unprecedented” penalties

Reuters just reported that Penn State will remove a statue of the late football coach Joe Paterno, who was implicated in a coverup of serial child abuse by one of his coaching staff.

The article quotes University President Rodney Erickson,

“I now believe that, contrary to its original intention, Coach Paterno’s statue has become a source of division and an obstacle to healing in our university and beyond…”

Earlier in the week, the Ivy League’s Brown University announced that it will rename an annual sports award originally named for Paterno.

UPDATES:  The statue is gone.  NCAA poised to hit PSU with “unprecedented” penalties.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

9 comments

I think this is the right decision.  Joe Paterno, normally so focused on developing his players’ academic and personal lives as much as their athletic skills, lost sight of what was right and just in his misplaced concern for the PSU program.  Now his reputation is irredeemably marred, the program he gave his life to is in a shambles and the lives of everyone associated with this tawdry episode are scarred.

Doing what is right might bring short-term pain, but it avoids long-term catastrophe.

[1] Posted by Jeffersonian on 7-22-2012 at 01:18 PM · [top]

NCAA poised to hit PSU with “unprecedented” penalties.

Frankly, I’m not sure what jurisdiction the NCAA has in this matter. It seems to me this should be left to the civil and criminal courts. The former will likely issue financial judgments steep enough to bankrupt Penn State; the latter will likely deal harshly with those criminally responsible.

[2] Posted by the virginian on 7-22-2012 at 01:31 PM · [top]

Just shut it down for a year.  At least.  I don’t care about what they do with keeping kids on scholarship or not.  I’m an alum of a Big Ten school so it will hurt my alma mater some, but they need to get their collective crap together.  I just can’t see how they can do that with an active program.

[3] Posted by Bill2 on 7-22-2012 at 10:47 PM · [top]

Keeping the JoePa statue where it is would be a long-term reminder both of his accomplishments, and of the Sandusky incident.

Since high-level administrators were apparently deeply involved, I’m sure they want to get rid of the statue so that there won’t be such a visible reminder.

I would let it stay.

If I were the NCAA, I would not take any action that would punish the current football players, who are presumably innocent. (I wonder whether some past players knew what was going on.)

I’m sure there must be appropriate ways for the NCAA to make a very strong statement, other than depriving these young people of the chance to play college football at a high level, and for some to prepare themselves for an NFL career.

This should be about rehabilitation, not vengeance.

[4] Posted by Ralph on 7-23-2012 at 05:51 AM · [top]

I think the death penalty has too many unintended consequences; I doubt we will ever see it again. 

What happened at Penn State was tragic, but only a few were “in the know”.  I thought the penalties were about right.

Very sad that some people lost sight about what is really important and allowed innocent children’s lives to be ruined to protect a moster.

[5] Posted by B. Hunter on 7-23-2012 at 08:58 AM · [top]

the virginian

The NCAA has authority because the programs and universities give it authority, and it has grown in power and influence ever since. Basically, the big programs get off (usually…not always) while the smaller programs get axed. Also, political correctness plays a big role in their decisions. If Penn State had hired a homosexual or Latino coach, their penalty would have probably been less severe.

[6] Posted by All-Is-True on 7-23-2012 at 09:31 AM · [top]

So, the NCAA has announced a $60 million fine, among other actions.

That should start a major feeding frenzy among the lawyers. I’d guess they’ll go berserk, trying to get a court order to freeze payment of the fine, since the fine otherwise would presumably be paid long before any of the inevitable civil suits come to trial.

I wonder what financial resources Penn State would have. They will be drained dry.

[7] Posted by Ralph on 7-23-2012 at 09:32 AM · [top]

I would be very surprised if Penn State’s football program ever recovers from this. Even after the fines, the lawsuits, the publicity and shame, etc., now that the Paterno legacy has been removed from every PSU obelisk (and I guess it had to be), what does the program now have to draw on to bring in financial resources and big high school recruits? If Alabama went through a scandal like this today, its program would probably survive to compete another day. But if it had gone through this towards the end of the Paul Bryant years, the program would have been crippled and Tide football would only be a shell of what it is today.

[8] Posted by All-Is-True on 7-23-2012 at 09:48 AM · [top]

I was living in Dallas when SMU received the death penalty in the late 1980s, relating to a recruiting scandal that also involved the then-governor of the state.  I recall watching when a local tv station broke the story.  SMU’s football program has never fully recovered, although it is now in the best shape it’s been in for a long time.  But it has taken 25 years.

[9] Posted by Dallasite on 7-23-2012 at 10:03 AM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.