Party of Death Makes it Official

It’s just a matter of time before we’re compelled at bayonet-point to aid in the extermination of the unborn.

I believe that life begins at conception, and that all abortions are murder.  However, I would prefer to stop the 1,000,000 and allow 16,000 vs. allowing them all.  I think that Gov. Romney’s position might just be the right position at the right time.  I am praying we can stop all abortions, but it might have to be done incrementally.

Where did 16,000 number come from anyway?  That seems like a lot of folks getting pregnant from sexual crimes.

BTW, the Dems are really showing their true colors - and I believe that this will be turning more and more folks off.  The only time they are successful is when they pretend to be conservatives…

I wonder how LibCats are feeling right about now, having taken one on the chin for Obamacare and contraception, now they get to fork over the dough for outright abortion. 

How can any Catholic even consider voting for thes people?

1% of all abortions per year (1.6 million) are said to be the result of rape or incest.

Murdering babies with money borrowed from China.  How very Mao-eske.

I have only one friend who had an abortion, during college—her pregnancy was the result of a date rape, and we were clueless about “Plan B” back then.  I think there should be far more education about emergency contraception.  It’s less costly in terms of dollars and anguish, and can help a rape victim regain some control in her life.

Hi Elanor,

“Plan B” acts as an abortificient…it is a murderous pill that no Christian should take or advocate taking since in many cases the pill will snuff out a human baby:

“In some cases, the pills prevent ovulation, but in other cases they inhibit implantation of an embryo. In cases in which an embryo cannot implant, the drug acts as a chemical abortifacient and that leads to the confusion between the two drugs. Pharmaceutical companies have addressed this issue by referencing this method of birth control as “emergency contraception” instead of the Morning-After Pill.”

“Gaining control” must not be such a high priority that it legitimizes murdering babies.

http://www.christianliferesources.com/article/the-abortion-pill-and-the-morning-after-pill-are-they-the-same-1023

If they actually adopt this and if they win in November, we can look to Red China as the model for how this plays out.  And then of course, there will be the Obamacare death panels and the little purple pill for those who pass some arbitrary age like 70 or so, when they have no more to contribute to the collective.

And certainly the fellow I visited in the hospital this week with Down’s Syndrome; he’ll never pass the “cost/benefits” testing by the mighty elites in Washington.  What a glorious world it will be for the workers paradise.

How long will I have to patiently wait to encounter the person who says in the face of this: “how did all this happen?”  I think I will not waste my breath on that person.

Hmmmm…

“Christian Democrat”

Now officially an oxymoron.

KTF!...mrb

I’m not holding my breath for the media to call out the extreme nature of this platform.  It would distract them from perpetuating the “war on women” message.

I’m not holding my breath for the media to call out the extreme nature of this platform.

Jennifer Rubin, the author of the Washington Post’s “Right Turn” blog, is the only member of the so-called “mainstream media” I’m aware of who’s pointed out the Democrats’ extreme position on abortion.

I wonder what the recently deceased Nellie Gray, founder of the March for Life, would have to say about the Democrats’ platform. According to her obituary in the Post, Ms. Gray was a Democrat.

Well, God and Jerusalem are back in, but that seems to be it for improvements.

I never thought I would see the day a major political party booed down God, even if the guy at the podium tried to pretend it didn’t happen.  It was shocking enough when they booed the American flag and the Boy Scouts two conventions ago.  You would have thought they would have learned their lesson to make sure to hide their true nature from the American people.

The shocked expression on the face of the person offering the amendment said it all.  I would like to hope he promptly resigned from the Democrat Party, but I doubt that happened.  But now all America gets to see, on national TV, who they are aligned with.

oh, we will see it again and again—it’s gonna make a great campaign commercial.  if Romney/Ryan don’t use the footage, one of the superPACs will.

very very sad day, nonetheless

What has struck me about the DNC is the shots of the delegates.  Is this the convention of a major US political party, or some gettogether of the UN General Assembly?  It certainly doesn’t appear to be representative of the demographics of my state.  Maybe it’s just the cameraman’s choice of subjects.

What has been missed is the fact that the term was God given rights. Progressives believe that all rights come from the government. There was another reason for the removal other than political correctness.

Evan:  The mainstream media are full partners with the Democratic Party.  One of the Democrat/MSM themes is that the Democrats are inclusive and made up of a rainbow of ethnicities while the Republicans are a bunch of old, white, racist men.  The shots of the delegates are meant to convey this.

Jamesw,

I’m certainly aware of the media’s unrelenting cheerleading for Obama.  I just think that most of what I’ve seen and heard on the CNN coverage of the DNC will scare the pants off of flyover country.  I know it makes my hair stand on end here in KY.

Democrats - the Soylent Green Party.

“Is this the convention of a major US political party, or some gettogether of the UN General Assembly?  It certainly doesn’t appear to be representative of the demographics of my state. “

Evan,
That’s because your state’s racial demographics are less diverse than the United States as a whole and even more less diverse than those of the universe of registered Democrats.

“(Romney’s) position would sanction the murder of the children of sexual criminals, about 16,000 babies per year.”

I don’t know how you force a rape victim to carry that baby to term.  We should attempt to persuade the woman to give the child up for adoption.  While the rape victim didn’t ask to be raped, the baby didn’t ask to be born (and still doesn’t deserve to be killed).  I get that.  But making it a crime to abort a baby even in the case of rape?  I don’t know what the right answer is on this.  I do know it’s complex, but I do not know what the good would be done in criminalizing this.