
Time to Put Conservatives on Major Congressional Committees
It’s hard to describe just how wretchedly long a process it will be for elected conservatives to have much influence within the House and Senate. This article from Red State throws into sharp relief the very very long 10-15 year process it will be [if that short] before conservatives can hope to have some say about what comes up for a vote, for instance. They simply are not in positions of power within even an institution that is controlled by the Republican Party and one that has experienced gaining more elected conservatives than the Senate—the House of Representatives.
Those who believe that all we need to do is elect another 10-20 actual conservatives before we can begin to change the shape of government are about as delusional as those who believe that we have but to elect another 20-40 deputies to General Convention and we can then begin to change the shape of the House of Deputies [see, I’ve helpfully scaled the numbers up for the doubled-size of the HOD as compared to the US House of Representatives]. And yes, I’m comparing the revisionists in the House of Deputies to the Republicans in the House of Representatives. And even at a rate of 10 or so elected conservatives every two years to replace 10 or so Rinos. . . well, you can do the math.
So yeh ... 10-15 years to have some influence, if we have good elections every single time and if conservatives are ultra-disciplined and work the system.
How do we remake the House as a conservative firewall against big government? Even if we elect more conservatives, history has shown that they rarely set the agenda outside of leadership. We could focus on lofty goals, such as replacing the current leaders or even installing new committee chairman. Sadly, those goals are largely out of reach. There is one realistic way we can assert control over the legislative process, though. That is by pushing our best members onto the most consequential committees.
In terms of steering conservatives into committee chairmanships, we have an uphill climb. The only significant opportunity will open up at the Budget Committee, if Paul Ryan becomes Vice President. At that point, we will have an opportunity to push for Rep. Scott Garrett, the vice chairman, to grab the gavel of the committee. However, a more realistic yet important goal would be to install conservatives as regular members on the ‘Super-A’ committees.
By far, the three most consequential committees with jurisdiction over domestic policy are Ways and Means, Appropriations, and Energy & Commerce. Not surprisingly, those are the worst performing committees from a conservative perspective.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- Never Let a Tragedy Go to Waste
- More from the IX Commandment beat
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics
- Hey Anglicans, hearing the Benghazi testimony, how ‘bout that IX Commandment?
- Better headgear or wii to prevent terrorism
- Gay marriage ‘key factor’ in Tory Eastleigh defeat
- An Interesting Theory on Political Engagement from an SF Commenter

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
3 comments
Good perspective Sarah. This is long haul stuff, and we better do it, and repeat, and repeat.
One of the great myths of presidential elections is that presidents determine the federal budget. Its congress…and congress has increased federal spending by 300%—adjusted for inflation—since 1970. 300%. That’s the fiscal cliff. Literally, they are spending capital, and free markets actually require investment, products, and consumers—not just pumped up inflated money to stimulate spending.
Watching the debate last night, there were some great moments, and some terrible ones. My favorite line was Romney’s, “the states are the laboratory of democracy.” The disappointment was Romney’s agreement on how the questions are framed. Why on earth were presidential candidates talking about elementary schools or community colleges? That’s just not their job, period. Neither candidate grasps the fundamental problem of medicare—that government currently accounts for 50% of healthcare spending, and this has utterly destroyed free market pricing. Neither candidate grasps the problem with insurance cartels, subsidized by tax write offs, third party pay for every single procedure, payed for by employers, so consumers and providers have no real idea what anything costs. Both guys actually said Social Security is fundamentally sound. WHAT?
[1] Posted by Theron Walker✙ on 10-4-2012 at 09:29 AM · [top]
Good luck with that. I have it on good authority that Boehner isn’t tossing the Tea-Partiers any biscuits as far as committee nominations are concerned. And, he has called anti-TARP folks, “knuckle-draggers.”
Which is reason enough for me not to vote for him.
[2] Posted by J Eppinga on 10-4-2012 at 11:39 AM · [top]
I have it on good authority that Boehner took down the tea party caucus…he made the knuckle under. Of course, they did, while others haven’t. He is the essence of Rhino, and underlines why the party system is so dangerous….we vote in “our” party, then, they don’t follow our platform, etc… But, the parallels to TEC and leadership in general are amazing. Before internet, would we even know what a scum bag Boehner is?
BTW, Peter Schweizer’s book Throw them All Out shows how congress plays by fundamentally different rules than everyone else in America—how congress is different than state governments, and on how corrupt congress is, on both sides of the aisle. He gives extensive proof on how they enrich themselves on the backs of the public, how they do things that citizens would go to jail for. etc…
Question: would you vote for a skeezy member of the “right” party?
[3] Posted by Theron Walker✙ on 10-4-2012 at 03:30 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.