
Irony State: College Diversity Officer Placed on Leave for Expressing Opinion
The chief diversity officer at Gallaudet University has been placed on paid leave after she signed a petition to put a gay marriage referendum on the ballot in Maryland.
Gallaudet President T. Alan Hurwitz announced Angela McCaskill’s leave in a statement Wednesday.
Hurwitz says McCaskill “participated in a legislative initiative that some feel is inappropriate” for someone in her position.
Gallaudet is the nation’s leading university for the deaf and hard of hearing.
McCaskill lives in Maryland, where voters will decide in November whether to approve a state law legalizing gay marriage. The referendum was placed on the ballot by opponents of same-sex unions.
McCaskill’s signature on the petition was disclosed in July by the Washington Blade. She did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- TEC Minnesota gives local option for same sex marriage
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics
- Andrew Wilson and Rob Bell on Unbelievable
- Don’t Sign the Letter
- Homeschooling and Socialization
- Methodist Minister Defies Church in “Deeply Personal Act” of Politics (UPDATED)
- Religions Not Accepting of Everybody

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
11 comments
Thanks for picking up on this story. The Wash Post buried the story deep in today’s Metro section, oddly at the bottom of the Federal Worker page. It looks like the homosexual lobby got hold of the names on the submitting petitions, and sifted them, looking for folks to retaliate against for signing in the first place. The teaching here would be that if you don’t support gay rights, you don’t deserve a job.
The school has acknowledged that there is no university policy against political participation. Indeed, in the days of a much tougher Hatch Act, there was never a prohibition on federal employees in signing a political petition.
This is a horrible story, and the “Marriage Equality” group here in Maryland has recognized that, and has already called for Dr. McCaskill’s reinstatement. She is a deaf African American, with a distinguished career, many years at Gallaudet, and should never have been subjected to this abuse.
[1] Posted by Dick Mitchell on 10-11-2012 at 09:15 AM · [top]
Don’t administrators consider the possible blow back on decisions like this? T. Alan Hurwitz should be fired.
[2] Posted by Fr. Dale on 10-11-2012 at 01:43 PM · [top]
First they came for the white people, and I did not speak out because I’m not white.
Then they came for the men, and I did not speak out because I’m not a man.
Then they came for the conservatives, and I did not speak out because I’m not a conservative.
Then they came for the evangelicals, and I did not speak out because I’m not an evangelical.
Then they came for the Catholics, and I did not speak out because I’m not a Catholic.
Then they came for the African-American women with disabilities who believe in traditional marriage, and I found out there was no one left to speak out for me. . . .
[3] Posted by Jim the Puritan on 10-11-2012 at 01:50 PM · [top]
Theh McCarthy black list is back.
[4] Posted by Br. Michael on 10-11-2012 at 03:45 PM · [top]
Academic diversity officers pretty much owe their existence to silly, academic, clued out political correctness. Their job is to convince everyone that their school is more on board the liberal political agenda than anyone else. Understand that - academic diversity officers are first and foremost PR spinmeisters, whose job it is to convince everyone that affirmative action defined very broadly (i.e. includes not only racial minorities but “sexual minorities” as well) is alive and well, good for us, and that their school is doing more to aid and abet this group than others.
But understand this, and understand it well - “diversity” refers to non-white ethnicities, non-Christian religions, non-heterosexual sexual “minorities”, and non-conservative intellectual perspectives. Real diversity is most unwelcome.
[5] Posted by jamesw on 10-11-2012 at 04:00 PM · [top]
Re diversity - and this is off-thread =
I attended Chapel Hill in the 1960s, and we took a campus ballot on the 1964 Johnson/Goldwater election, and it came out something like 55/45 Johnson. And we were a crowd of small-town, medium town, largely male, largely white undergrads.
Now my nephew attended an expensive upscale private school in southern California (Pomona), and when I visited, he bragged that its student body voted “over 95 percent” for Obama.
Where is the diversity?
[6] Posted by Dick Mitchell on 10-11-2012 at 05:01 PM · [top]
Evidently some advocates of “diversity” and “tolerance” believe in practicing neither if you don’t agree with them.
[7] Posted by the virginian on 10-11-2012 at 05:06 PM · [top]
Her problem was the mistaken belief that she was hired as a diversity officer. She was actually supposed to be the Chief Liberal Agenda Officer, and ran afoul of the requirements of that position.
Academic freedom, we don’t need no academic freedom….for conservatives.
[8] Posted by Paul B on 10-12-2012 at 11:06 AM · [top]
This study says it all. Diversity doesn’t really mean diversity.
[9] Posted by jamesw on 10-12-2012 at 12:50 PM · [top]
Precisely, #8 and #9. As Tom Sowell acidly puts it, diversity means conformity of though hiding behind superficial differences.
[10] Posted by Jeffersonian on 10-12-2012 at 12:53 PM · [top]
Well, now.
“She signed a petition to put gay marriage referendum on the ballot.”
ANGELA MCCASKILL WAS SUSPENDED BECAUSE SHE SIGNED AN ANTI-GAY PETITION AFTER LISTENING TO AN ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE SERMON AT HER CHURCH.
Just so you know.
[11] Posted by JuliaMarks on 10-14-2012 at 11:05 AM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.