Terrorism or Workplace Violence?
You decide. Terrorism or workplace violence?
Victims of the Nov. 2009 Ft. Hood shooting are being denied benefits commensurate with combat injuries because the Obama administration refuses to label the attack an act of terrorism.
Should we really be trying to balance our budget on the backs of men and women who volunteered to protect this country?
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- States Have a Right to Protect Residents from Illegal Immigration
- Gang Immigration Bill (S.744) is Comprehensively Flawed
- Never Let a Tragedy Go to Waste
- They lived not only in ages past (South Sudan news)
- More from the IX Commandment beat
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics
- Hey Anglicans, hearing the Benghazi testimony, how ‘bout that IX Commandment?
Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
6 comments
The Prez has to maintain the facade that no domestic acts of terrorism occured during his watch.
[1] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 10-22-2012 at 03:21 PM · [top]
Isn’t it odd that moments after some lunatic shot Gabby Giffords, the Left had metaphysical certainty that he was motivated by a graphic he never saw or, if he had, that he cared nothing for, i.e. Sarah Palin’s map of Arizona with a crosshairs on it? Yet here is a fellow who was a devoted pen pal of a jihadist imam so blinkered that the Obama administration didn’t hesitate to send a Hellfire missle his way, and who shouted “Allahu akbar!!!” as he shot dozens, and somehow we’ll never, ever understand what could have possibly driven him to such a rampage.
[2] Posted by Jeffersonian on 10-22-2012 at 08:55 PM · [top]
Workplace violence or terrorism?
More like a mind perverted and inflamed by fundamentalist supremacistic Mohammedanism - following the rabid fumings of the mullahs who live to hate Jews and Christians and conquer all who do not submit to Islam.
[3] Posted by St. Nikao on 10-23-2012 at 04:41 AM · [top]
St. Nikao—In other words a religion based terroist.
[4] Posted by BillB on 10-23-2012 at 09:01 AM · [top]
And it is only due to the military leadership being utterly cowed by political correctness that this man’s substandard performance of his duties was tolerated and he was allowed to remain in uniform in the first place.
[5] Posted by evan miller on 10-23-2012 at 01:48 PM · [top]
Shameful. Cowardly. Disgusting.
I sure HOPE there is a CHANGE in November…
[6] Posted by B. Hunter on 10-23-2012 at 08:32 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.