May 18, 2013

October 29, 2012


Mark Baddeley on the Faithless Fulcrum Statement on Women Bishops

I’ve picked up a comment over at T19 about the manipulative, threatening, cynical, and faithless statement by Fulcrum:

There’s a statement by Fulcrum? What could have prompted it? Oh, I know, some evangelical group (CEEC this time) must have had the audacity to say something not in line with what the liberal hierarchy wants, and so its time for the enablers to come out and ‘maintain the evangelical centre’. Seriously, when was the last time this group of courageous ‘evangelical’ lions took a public stand against anyone other than evangelicals?

And you’ve got to love the commitment to due process and the established form of government. We want everyone who wants women bishops to vote for this measure - even if there are things about that measure that those delegates don’t want even more than they want women bishops. And we want everyone who doesn’t want women bishops to simply abstain.

That way we can have what we want - women bishops at any costs - and no-one else gets what they want. They can then try and work out how to function within the new era that has been ushered in so very graciously. As if a public statement like this doesn’t already clearly send the signal as to what to expect in the new administration.

On what planet do you seriously encourage people to ignore the legislation as a whole and just vote for it because they want the end it is trying to accomplish? And on what planet do you encourage delegates democratically elected to not vote on the issue of the day that would have been a factor in their being voted to the body in the first place?

Give us everything we want, now, and trust us. We’re gentlemen and ladies, you have nothing to fear. The sad thing is, they probably actually believe that about themselves.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

Facebook comments are closed.

4 comments

On what planet do you seriously encourage people to ignore the legislation as a whole and just vote for it because they want the end it is trying to accomplish?

Well, how about the US and Obamacare, for a start?  There seems to be very much an “end justifies the means” mentality among liberals, no matter whether we are talking the church or government.

[1] Posted by ToAllTheWorld on 10-29-2012 at 01:57 PM · [top]

tjmcmahon comments on T19 that Fulcrum has also dirked orthodox anglo-catholics in the CofE.

So Fulcrum aren’t prejudiced or discriminatory - they will go against any orthodox group!

[2] Posted by MichaelA on 10-29-2012 at 07:32 PM · [top]

In England, the Church Society has now joined Reform and CEEC in urging members to vote against the women bishops measure: http://www.evangelicals.org/news.asp?id=1519

[3] Posted by MichaelA on 10-31-2012 at 10:54 PM · [top]

The women bishops measure goes before General Synod of the Church of England for a final vote on 20 November 2012.  Pray that the Lord’s will be done in this, and that every person in Sydney earnestly seeks His will.

[4] Posted by MichaelA on 11-5-2012 at 02:18 AM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.