
Election Prediction: The Only One You Need to Know
The official prediction (as of today) of America’s most accurate and least well-known political analyst: Romney wins the popular vote 52-47. He wins the electoral college by 277-261.
The presidential election is going to come down to five states: Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Nevada, and New Hampshire. (Among those that Real Clear Politics has reckoned as toss-ups, I give Romney Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, and Colorado, while I give Obama Michigan and Pennsylvania.) The other five really could go either way. But in my estimation, I see Romney winning Wisconsin, Iowa, and New Hampshire, with Obama picking up Ohio and Nevada. So there really is a way for Romney to win without the Buckeye State.
Here’s why: the “fundamentals of the election,” as the president referred to them a couple of weeks ago, have never been good for Obama. I don’t have to rehearse all the bad economic indicators–everyone knows that the economy is in bad shape, that Obama has done little that has made a difference, and that the economy and unemployment are the two biggest issues in voters’ minds.
Those fundamentals haven’t changed, and the fact that Obama has been unable to get over about 47% in terms of popular vote is the best indication that the majority of the electorate is ready for a change. The only question has always been whether they would vote for his challenger. That’s why the president’s entire campaign has been about demonizing the Republican. He is counting on the undecided voter’s choice coming down to the devil he knows and the one he doesn’t.
That’s why the first debate was so important. It shattered the Obama-built mythology of Romney as an uncaring, robotic, plutocratic vulture capitalist whose only concern was getting bigger tax breaks for his ultra-rich friends. Once Romney became a viable alternative, his popular vote victory was assured.
The electoral college, however, is far less certain. Obama’s campaign has come down to a narrow focus on a handful of toss-up states and a slim slice of the electorate. At this point, the only people he cares about are 1) disenchanted liberals who may sit it out rather than hold their noses and vote for Obama; 2) socially liberal but economically moderate-to-conservative women who can still be scared into voting with their “lady parts” rather than on the economic issues that really concern them; and 3) young people who would vote for Obama if they did, but can’t even remember what day the election is on. Those are the people that the Big Bird/binders/birth control campaign has been directed at, which is to say that it is about one last push to make Romney unelectable.
That strategy can make it closer than it should be, but it can’t win. That’s especially the case because Obama lost independents back in 2009, and they have never come back. He’s going to suffer at least a 15% turn-around in the independent vote, and I don’t think there’s any way he can turn out enough Democrats to make up that difference. When you combine that with the fact that Republicans are going to turn out in bigger numbers than they did four years ago (Bush fatigue combined with a candidate lots of Republicans disliked suppressed that vote, while even those who don’t particularly care for Romney are going to turn out in droves just to get Obama out of the White House), that’s the ballgame.
Now, this is all seven days out, and there’s ample time for change (that’s especially the case if the mainstream media decides to stop sucking their collective thumbs and actually do some reporting on the scandal in Libya, which is going to destroy some careers even if the president is re-elected). So I’ll be back on Monday with a final look at what’s likely to happen on Tuesday. But unless Romney does something really, really stupid, the only thing that is likely to change in the next week is the growth in his margin of victory.
Share this story:
Recent Related Posts
- More from the IX Commandment beat
- Gay Marriage is to Govt. as is Study Hall to Academics
- Hey Anglicans, hearing the Benghazi testimony, how ‘bout that IX Commandment?
- Better headgear or wii to prevent terrorism
- Gay marriage ‘key factor’ in Tory Eastleigh defeat
- An Interesting Theory on Political Engagement from an SF Commenter
- Gentry Liberals and Brass Knuckles: The Case of Maureen Dowd

Comments
Facebook comments are closed.
16 comments
Thanks for your analysis. As an avid SF reader, I was hoping one of the credible contributors would make up for the earlier garbage by that Fountain hack.
[1] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 10-30-2012 at 09:25 AM · [top]
You need to know my semi-infallible election prediction, too.
>>
http://wannabeanglican.blogspot.com/2012/10/useless-semi-infallible-election.html
I do think David has it about right.
[2] Posted by Newbie Anglican on 10-30-2012 at 09:44 AM · [top]
if the mainstream media decides to stop sucking their collective thumbs and actually do some reporting on the scandal in Libya, which is going to destroy some careers
Unlike Watergate, real people have died in Libya-gate. In the trumped up Valerie Plame affair Scooter Libby ended up with a felony conviction. I would expect real justice in Libya-gate to produce some serious prison time for someone[s].
So, yes some careers are going to get destroyed. And then, when the MSM is bored with Libya-gate, they can go back and take a peek at Fast and Furious. Even juicier…....perhaps hundreds have died, including a US Border Patrol agent.
[3] Posted by Capt. Father Warren on 10-30-2012 at 11:43 AM · [top]
The trend is OH is for Romney. Big time. I think it’s entirely within the realm of possibility Romney gets over 300 electoral votes.
I’m what you’d consider a classical liberal. I think the Acton Institute is a phenomenally awesome resource for people of faith. The problem I have with conservatism is that it just wants to stop the progress of socialism. I guess I’m more an abolitionist, abolish income taxes, the Fed, the IRS, Social Security, Medicare, Obamacare . . . you name it.
I do think conservatives can be useful though. I think the Tea Party was promising. But I think just opposing stuff won’t do.
A comprehensive plan and action to retake the culture (media, news and academia for starters) needs to be implemented. Soros and other likeminded wealthy people and foundations have been spending small fortunes to win more and more ground for leftism. With all that, according to the most recent Gallup poll, Conservatives and Moderates make up 75% of Americans. Liberals are still only 21%! This should be good news. But I look at all the $$$ being thrown at academia and journalism schools by Soros & Co and I don’t see anything remotely like that for right-of-center groups at all.
[4] Posted by Seanny Rotten on 10-30-2012 at 02:37 PM · [top]
One other thing, over a year ago I was “excommunicated” from the episcopal cafe for basically expressing an opinion contrary to the Party Line with admittedly a healthy dose of snark. I’d be really surprised if anything like that happened here.
[5] Posted by Seanny Rotten on 10-30-2012 at 02:39 PM · [top]
I wish Obama actually respected his oath to uphold the Constitution and didn’t appoint “scholars” like Elena Kagan with the mystery X-ray vision to find “the privacy of abortion rights” buried in an 18th century document.
I wish Romney’s economic plan weren’t flagrantly mendacious and that cutting taxes by 20% would raise tax revenue.
I wish that Obama didn’t steal the power to kill Americans without due process.
I wish Romney’s “my plan covers people with pre-existing conditions” didn’t mean “emergency rooms only for sick people without insurance.”
But that’s not the way it is.
Obama will win {Wisconsin, Michigan, Penn., Nevada and (New Hampshire and/or Iowa) and (Ohio and/or Virginia and/or Colorado)}. Obama will win.
I hope Christians will overcome the world.
[6] Posted by The Plantagenets on 10-30-2012 at 03:46 PM · [top]
Here’s my map based on how poorly the 2010 mid-term elections, Scott Walker’s recall bid and Ted Cruz’s primary run were predicted: http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_predictions.php?mapid=Ykw (in case that doesn’t work; Romney 377, Obama 161).
For decades the response rate on polling was 50%. For the last 3 or so years it’s been 9%. 9%!!! Somehow contemporary polling doesn’t count independents and tea party types worth a damn.
[7] Posted by Seanny Rotten on 10-30-2012 at 03:46 PM · [top]
#1. My man, T-Fountain. Again with the young people.
Yes, some young people are retarded, and yes, our culture has a crazy obsession with youth. But at least we didn’t deregulate Wall Street, borrow $1,000,000,000 from the Chinese to look for WMD’s in Iraq, or take 50+% debt/GDP from future generations to blow on tax cuts and entitlements at a 30:1 ratio for the elderly against children.
[8] Posted by The Plantagenets on 10-30-2012 at 04:05 PM · [top]
The Plantagenets: the joke is more on boomers like me, who keep contorting ourselves into absurd positions trying to reach THE YOUNG PEOPLE, based on our assumption that they are just like us and simply waiting for us to come up with some fresh new expression of ourselves.
[9] Posted by Timothy Fountain on 10-30-2012 at 04:15 PM · [top]
Correction: the above should read $1,000,000,000,000
I suppose that’s why my venerable forefathers in their wisdom invented scientific notation
[10] Posted by The Plantagenets on 10-30-2012 at 04:17 PM · [top]
#9
Sorry, for the friendly fire. I turn into a very serious young man when I think about the mess I’ll have to pay for.
[11] Posted by The Plantagenets on 10-30-2012 at 04:21 PM · [top]
And thanks for pointing out the joke on the boomers. It’s actually kind of creepy to function as someone’s historical dialectic from the receiving end.
[12] Posted by The Plantagenets on 10-30-2012 at 04:23 PM · [top]
My prediction is that we will see a solid and larger than expected Romney victory, which will include Florida, Virginia, New Hampshire, Ohio, Colorado, Iowa, probably Wisconsin, and quite possibly Minnesota and Pennsylvania. I have zero confidence in my prediction though. My reasons are as follows:
1) I suspect that Romney will generally outperform the polls. As others have said, the polls that show Obama leading or even neck-and-neck assume a higher D turnout than seems warranted.
2) The momentum still seems to be with Romney, though I am guessing that the storm may throw things off somewhat. But bottom line is that I think it too late now for momentum to go to Obama. It doesn’t make sense for me for Romney to surge close in places like Oregon, Minnesota and Pennsylvania if he isn’t ahead in places like Ohio, Virginia and Florida. I agree with those who see the first debate as being critical. Obama had about 47% of the vote locked up. Romney had about 43%. The debate gave Romney another 5%, and the remaining 5% is likely to break Romney’s way, more so because of the debate performance.
3) Take a look at what the campaigns are actually doing - both over the last few weeks and also right now. The Obama campaign is really trying to appeal to its base, Romney is trying to appeal to the undecideds. The campaigns are both shifting to what were once thought to be solid D states. Some Obama surrogates are starting to point fingers in pre-emptive blame gaming.
My lack of confidence is because all of my thoughts remain speculation and I don’t have possession of sufficient hard data to be sure of things.
[13] Posted by jamesw on 10-30-2012 at 06:02 PM · [top]
I predict 49% Obama, 47% Romney - but I think Romney may get an electoral majority.
[14] Posted by iamaworm on 10-30-2012 at 07:03 PM · [top]
Hope this prediction proves accurate! I wonder if this was before or after Sandy. I’m afraid the slimeball (that’s Obama) will use the storm tohis advantage. He’s making a show of concern and being right out there and right on the ball providing federal help. Also there’s some talk on some blogs about problems with election day due to the storm. You can bet that if he can somehow use this he will.
[15] Posted by Nellie on 10-30-2012 at 07:48 PM · [top]
There’s a good chance we could have Obama win the electoral college while Romney wins the popular vote. Think 2000 but the other way around.
[16] Posted by John Boyland on 10-30-2012 at 07:58 PM · [top]
Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.
Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.