March 24, 2017

October 12, 2015


Sydney Archbishop Glenn Davies Calls Christians to Gracious Engagement in Marriage Debate

Yesterday marked the start of the Sydney Diocese Synod. In his presidential address [pdf] (video available here) Archbishop Glenn Davies covered a range of areas, including our combined reponse to the Syrian refugee crisis and the challenge of a growing metropolis. But the section that the media picked up on (and understandably so) was when he turned to the current debates about marriage in our culture.

“The antagonism of the world to the Word of God is perhaps seen nowhere more acutely than in the virulent challenge to the definition of marriage which pervades conversations in the media, the workplace and even in our places of leisure.” Dr Davies said. “It is time that all Christians, especially Anglicans, should enter the discussion and graciously and sensitively explain the reasons why our good Creator has made marriage the way he has.  We need to be courageous in our discussions both in private and in public, yet we also need to be sensitive and loving in our defence of biblical truth.”

Davies also had a word concerning internal debates in the church.

Yet what was accepted and endorsed by the major parties a little more than a decade ago has now become anathema to the majority of the Labor Party and to several influential members of the Liberal Party. It would also appear that an Anglican Bishop in our country believes it is inevitable, and has even opined that it could be compatible with the teaching of our Church!

I think it’s fair to say that public comment upon what another diocesan bishop (John Parkes of Wangaratta) has said is a significant step for Archbishop Davies to take. Wednesday night will see the consideration of a number of related motions on the floor of synod, including an engagement with the recent actions of Parkes and Bishop Kay Goldsworthy in Gippsland.


Share this story:


Recent Related Posts

Comments

6 comments

The interesting stuff starts at ~15:00.

[1] Posted by J Eppinga on 10-13-2015 at 05:20 AM · [top]

“The antagonism of the world to the Word of God is perhaps seen nowhere more acutely than in the virulent challenge to the definition of marriage which pervades conversations in”... The Church itself!

[2] Posted by Undergroundpewster on 10-13-2015 at 08:05 AM · [top]

I recently attended a church in the Diocese of Atlanta. At the conclusion of the scripture reading, the lector said “Hear what the Spirit is saying to the Church.” They did not even claim that it was the Word of the Lord or even that the reading had any objective meaning.

[3] Posted by Pb on 10-13-2015 at 08:27 AM · [top]

#3 I’m probably being naive but I have always thought that the quote (from several places in Rev. 2) as used at the end of the lessons referred to Scripture being “breathed out by God” and that we are to hear what the (Holy) Spirit was saying in Scripture, His Holy Word. I believe, however, as a lesson closing, it originated in the NZ prayer book, which is not the most orthodox.

[4] Posted by johnd on 10-13-2015 at 02:13 PM · [top]

Pb.  That phrase has been used for years in some places.  My ex-home parish used it years
ago. I always thought it was because they didn’t want to have a Lord.  And as Spirit isn’t qualified, this could be very dangerous.

[5] Posted by DRLina on 10-13-2015 at 02:15 PM · [top]

I thought that it left it up to the Church (General Convention?) to say what is the plain meaning of scripture. Or another way of saying it means whatever you want it to.

[6] Posted by Pb on 10-14-2015 at 08:51 AM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.