March 26, 2017

April 16, 2012

Infiltrating the Churches: Part 2

The groups seeking to influence the mainline churches denominational meetings are a motley crew of left-wing political outfits and their allies inside those denominations. In case you aren’t familiar with them, I’d like to introduce them to you.

First, there’s the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation (USCEIO). It calls itself “the largest and most diverse coalition working to change U.S. policy toward Israel/Palestine to support human rights, international law, and equality.” That sounds nice, but it’s just verbiage. So is the Campaign’s claim not to support either a two-state or one-state solution to the Palestinian problem.

The reason is that the USCEIO supports, as a “human right,” the so-called “right of return” for Palestinians. This refers to the claim that hundreds of thousands of Arabs were forced at gunpoint by Israel to leave the country in 1948, and that those still alive and all of their descendants should have the freedom to return to Israel, reclaim any property they claim to have held at the time, and become citizens of the country. (In fact, most of the Arabs who left Israel at the time of the invasion of the new nation by five Arab armies did so simply to get out of the way of the fighting, or because they listened to Arab propaganda and thought they’d be returning home in a few weeks once their brethren had pushed the Jews into the sea. Check out the history as it was recorded at the time here. It should also be noted that almost a million Jews were expelled from various Arab nations in 1948 and years following, and the USCEIO has never uttered a word suggesting that they should be allowed to return to their former homes.)

This, of course, is a formula for the destruction of Israel as a Jewish national homeland. Adding what is now millions of Palestinians to the over one million Arabs who are already citizens of Israel (because they didn’t leave in 1948, and have therefore enjoyed greater freedom than any of their Arab brethren for over 60 years) would create an Arab majority. Assuming Israel remained a democracy, once the Palestinians were in charge of the country, things would change, to say the least. It is hardly beyond the ream of possibility that the new Arab-ruled Israel would expel the Jewish population, just as the Iraqis, Egyptians, Libyans, Syrians, and others before them. It’s also likely that, since the vast majority of Palestinians are Muslims, that Christians and any Jews allowed to remain would become dhimmis in short order. Finally, of course, there’s the dreadful human rights record of every other Arab nation to consider. Would a Palestinian-ruled Israel ape Syria or Saudi Arabia? Maybe not, but there’s little reason for Israel’s Jewish population to expect anything different, especially given the corruption and human rights violations of the Palestinian Authority, and the anti-Semitic ravings of Hamas.

The USCEIO is of the same mind as its leftist allies: Palestinians deserve the right of national self-determination, but Jews do not. It states as much in its FAQ:

The US Campaign does not endorse either a one-state or a two-state solution, but rather upholds the Palestinian right to self-determination. We believe the Palestinians must be empowered to exercise this right, and that the international community has a responsibility towards the right of the Palestinian to self-determination.

No mention of such a right for Israelis, or Israeli Jews, is mentioned anywhere on its web site.

That the USCEIO marches in lockstep with the far left is no surprise. Among the organizations that are members of this anti-Israel umbrella is a veritable Who’s Who of the American extreme left.  Among the member groups are long-time Communist fronts like the US Peace Council and the National Lawyers Guild, the International Socialist Organization, Code Pink, Global Exchange, the Council for the National Interest, the International Solidarity Movement, the U.S. Green Party, the Institute for Policy Studies, We Are Wide Awake (a project of anti-Semitic web site Veterans Today‘s Eileen Fleming), the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, the War Resisters League, If Americans Knew, the Rachel Corrie Foundation, and the U.S. Campaign fro Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel

Of course, the secular left is not alone in the USCEIO, which includes a wide range of church groups. Among these are the General Board of Global Ministries and General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church, the Methodist Federation for Social Action, Episcopal Peace Fellowship, the Episcopal Peace Fellowship Israel Palestine Network, the Episcopal Diocese of North Carolina, the PCUSA’s Israel Palestine Mission Network, the American Friends Service Committee, United Methodist Kairos Response, Pax Christi, Friends of Sabeel-North America, Christian Peacemakers Teams, Unitarian Universalists for Justice in the Middle East, and the Fellowship of Reconciliation.

Don’t think, however, that these Christian organizations (other than the Methodist General Board of Global Ministries, which I’ll return to in a moment) have a lot of say within the USCEIO. Of the five staff of the Campaign, the two most important and visible are Jewish, while the other three are of indeterminate religious background (though one has an Arabic name). The membership of the Steering Committee is especially interesting. For at least the last five years, one member has been Judith LeBlanc, a vice-chair of the Communist Party USA and national field organizer for Peace Action, which is also a USCEIO member organization. Another is Phyllis Bennis, fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. Yet another is Felicia Eaves, whose connections to the far left include Black Voices for Justice and the Marxist-dominated United for Peace and Justice, and who has been a featured speaker at events sponsored by the likes of the neo-Stalinist International ANSWER. Also on the Steering Committee are members from the Muslim American Society, American Muslims for Palestine, and the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California. Left-wing Judaism has a representative in Sydney Levy of Jewish Voice for Peace (remember this name—it will come up again tomorrow). Bringing up the rear are a couple of leftist media types (Andrew Kadi of Adalah-NY and Bill Fletcher Jr. of Black and two representatives of Christian organizations: David Wildman of the United Methodist General Board of Global Ministries and Mike Merryman-Lotze of the American Friends Service Committee.

Merryman-Lotze is the Israel-Palestine Program Director for the AFSC, but has otherwise kept a low profile on the Internet. Wildman, the “Executive Secretary for Human Rights and Racial Justice in Mission Contexts and Relationships” at the UMGBGM, is another story. He has been talking about Israeli “apartheid” and “colonialism” for years, as well as advocating for divestment. He has said of Zionism, “It’s a theology that is deeply exclusivist and racist.” An article of his appeared at Electronic Intifada in which he wrote:

The New Testament was written in a context of Roman colonial rule, discrimination, and military occupation in Palestine. It also took place in the midst of an active armed resistance movement (the Zealots) against colonialism and occupation. So, if we want to understand fully the meaning of biblical texts for today, it is helpful to listen to Palestinians who are facing the same dynamics of military occupation, colonial control of their land and apartheid-like discrimination.

You decide just what that is supposed to mean, or justify.

The USCEIO is not alone in its efforts to infiltrate the churches. A close ally in this effort is Jewish Voice for Peace. Both the staff and board of directors of JVP are shot through with individuals with resumes full of left-wing activism:

*Executive Director Rebecca Vilkomerson: “Rebecca has over fifteen years of experience in community organizing, advocacy, program development and fundraising in the United States and Israel.”

*Director of Advocacy Sydney Levy: “Sydney has worked for over 15 years in nonprofits advocating for LGBT human rights organizing for media justice, and assisting in the preparation of death row appeals.”

*Administrative Director Jane Suskin: “Long active in justice, peace and feminist causes.”

*Board member and treasurer Jethro Eisenstein: “Since 1971 he has been involved in the longest-running civil rights case in New York, which established a right to sue the NY Police Department to restrict surveillance of peaceful political activity.”

Board member and secretary Jordan Ash: “He later dropped out of college to work as a union organizer for SEIU.  After 12 years working at ACORN, where he played a leading role in the group’s campaign against predatory mortgage lending, he returned to the labor movement and now works for SEIU again.”

*Board member Noah Winer: “...was a founding campaign strategist at from 2003 to 2010.”

You get the idea. JVP is a political organization, and needless to say not a Christian one. It has no interest whatsoever in Christian theology or ethics, and doesn’t care what the right stance would be for Christian denominations to take would be based on their own beliefs or interests, and yet is heavily involved in the effort to get the denominations meeting this summer to buy into its divestment/boycott/sanctions agenda.

Jewish Voice for Peace has put out a flyer in connection with the Methodist General Conference that you can see here. Among the anti-Israel voices quoted in it are Archbishop Desmond Tutu (who thinks that pretty much everything is related to apartheid), and a Holocaust survivor named Hajo Meyer, a favorite of the anti-Semite set who has expressed support for the bizarre theory that most Jews are not really Jews, but descendants of a Central Asian people called the Khazars; referred to Zionism as “racist and separatist”; and declared that the Jewish state is the modern equivalent of Nazi Germany. He’s also claimed that the definition of “anti-Semitism” has changed:

“Formerly an anti-Semite was somebody who hated Jews because they were Jews and had a Jewish soul. But nowadays an anti-Semite is somebody who is hated by Jews.”

That’s the kind of person that Jewish Voice for Peace wants United Methodists to listen to next week.

Tomorrow: the tactics being used by the political left to infiltrate the churches.

Share this story:

Recent Related Posts



I’d love to see an analysis of the membership of these groups, specifically how they overlap.  I’d bet dollars to donuts they are 80% the same people from group to group, just using multiple fronts to create the illusion of a broader movement than it truly is.

[1] Posted by Jeffersonian on 4-17-2012 at 08:59 PM · [top]

It’s so sad to see this once-great forum for Orthodox Anglicans now being used as a platform for promoting Zionism and the political agenda of Israel.  If there has been infiltration of the Church by the political Left (and there has been), it’s been by Zionists like Mr. Fischler who seem to put devotion to the current Likud Party line over commitment to Christ and His Kingdom.  [link spam deleted]

[2] Posted by John3:16 on 4-17-2012 at 09:52 PM · [top]

Hi Cradle Anglican—I see you’re link spamming over here as you did on the other thread.

Please feel free to make your case rather than link spam.


[3] Posted by Sarah on 4-17-2012 at 10:37 PM · [top]

If there has been infiltration of the Church by the political Left (and there has been), it’s been by Zionists like Mr. Fischler who seem to put devotion to the current Likud Party line over commitment to Christ and His Kingdom?

What does that even mean?  And how well does it reflect on Christ and His Kingdom when so-called Christians reflexively decide that the only villain in the Middle East is Israel and have to completely ignore both history and the repeatedly-declared intentions of Israel’s enemies in order to do it?  It is sad to see how generous certain “Christians” are with Jewish blood.

[4] Posted by Christopher Johnson on 4-17-2012 at 11:20 PM · [top]

[off topic comment on commenting policy deleted; please take up issues with comment policy using the Private Message forum; continuous spamming of the same link without making your own argument will get it deleted asap]

[5] Posted by John3:16 on 4-18-2012 at 12:31 AM · [top]

Hey John or Cradle Anglican or whatever you’re calling yourself today: why don’t you respond to the actual content of the posts? A review of a book by an author I’m not discussing by someone else I’m not discussing has no possible relevance here, whether you call it spam or not. Two posts on this subject now, and you haven’t responded to a thing I’ve written, except to call names (“ZIONIST!”) and misdirect (“look, over there, Israel doing something evil!”)

At no point have I said that Israel is beyond criticism. I’ve criticized Israel in the past, especially the settlement policy, which is both illegal and stupid, and a roadblock to settling the conflict. But what the people I’m writing about—and you, apparently—believe is that Israel is uniquely evil, that it is the only sinner in the Middle East, that it must be held to a moral standard that no other nation on Earth must meet, and that in order to settle the conflict it must die as it is presently constituted. Oh, and that Jews are the only people on the planet who don’t have a right to national self-determination, but must instead at all times place themselves at the mercy of those who hate them. That is who these people are, and they are using the mainline denominations to further a political agenda based on these beliefs. If you are not interested in discussing that, take your fish and peddle them elsewhere.

[6] Posted by David Fischler on 4-18-2012 at 07:43 AM · [top]

It is helpful to see a list of the left’s organizations and their networks, since they infiltrate the churches with political objectives and have the intent to use Church resources and name to further their causes. I find this series a good start and will watch for representatives of these organizations in my diocese. It doesn’t matter if the churches are TEC, ACNA, or other denomination, it is just good to know who we are dealing with.

These organizations veil themselves in distracting rhetoric, while Christians are trained to welcome and encourage diversity. This is not a good mix for church members who go to Christian education prepared with little more than coffee and donuts.

The Jewish homeland isn’t the subject of this thread, but rather the organization of political activism within the churches.

[7] Posted by Dr. N. on 4-18-2012 at 07:52 AM · [top]

Unfortunately, the issues are complex and require a deep and nuanced understanding of historical events. That makes it easy for these activists, using a few hot-button key words and a lot of diversionary language, to blow smoke at well-meaning religious communities and get nominal or active support. In fact, the first folks who must be fooled are themselves. How are we to deal with such people if it is impossible to engage them in a discussion of the facts themselves?

[8] Posted by ears2hear on 4-18-2012 at 12:09 PM · [top]

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.

Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more explanation, and the posts here, here, and here for advice on becoming a valued commenter as opposed to an ex-commenter. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments which you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm site administrators or Gri5th Media, LLC.