Thursday, September 2, 2010

Welcome to Stand Firm!

Want to advertise on Stand Firm? Click here for rates and info

LIVE BLOG: From the Floor of the House of Deputies: The Budget Debate & DOMA Resolution

Thursday, July 16, 2009 • 10:45 am


[9.50 a.m.]

The parliamentarian is going through the special rules for debate on the budget.

President: I will entertain clarifying questions only about the rules of debate.

[There are numerous clarifying questions on procedure.]

A motion has been made to reconsider the rules [rule 24] regarding not introducing legislation on the last two legislative days.

A SC deputy has asked to amend the suspension of those rules to apply only to the budget.

A point of order -- we are only reconsidering the suspension of the rules.

The question is moved on the motion to suspend Rule 24 for the purposes of new legislation today.

Rule 24 is suspended.

[TEXT to Rule 24: 24. Except by a vote of two-thirds of the members present, no new business requiring concurrent action shall be introduced in this House after the third second legislative day of its session, and no matter which originated in this House and which requires concurrent action by both Houses shall be considered by the House after the eighth seventh legislative day.]

[Clarifying questions over -- main debate open]

Pennsylvania -- In the spirit of Ubuntu -- members of Black Caucus are in appreciation of the church. If the heartbeat is mission -- we need to acknowledge the pain that this budget will bring. The clock is ticking for the environment and the church as well.

[President reminds house that we have only 10 minutes to discuss the "Revenues" topic.]

Western Michigan: As a member of the black caucus and in the spirit of ubuntu -- we stand with the staff members of the Episcopal family who will lose their jobs. [missed other]

Jennings, Ohio: Are we discussing revenues or the canonical section at this time?

Long Island: Seek to move forward in this church -- speaking on behalf of all members of the African diaspora -- working for continued reconciliation and healing. Pledge to strengthen our parishes and worshiping communities.

Wilson, Newark: In the spirit of ubuntu I rise to speak to this budget. While we feel that we have lost much and we grieve it -- it is not a death knell. The work of anti-racism and reconciliation must continue. Women's voices must be heard. Continue to visit the prisoner . . .

[It appears that there will be further speeches of this type and I will only blog

Deputy ???: Propose following revision of budget on communications -- to allow for a continued monthly publication of Episcopal Life and the communication survey. Amend to add essentially $1,614,936]. This number has been provided by the Office of Communications as its estimate of advertising revenues from their publication. . . . The amendment will allow us to fulfill D037 passed by this house earlier.

Board of Governors Deputy of Episcopal Life -- rise to speak in favor of this amendment. We need some facts -- to gather data and facts through the survey. If we are going to change our practice away from monthly newsprint we need to give our diocesan partners time for this change. Urge support of this amendment.

Arkansas deputy: Identify what percentage of the asking that your diocese gives to the budget.

East Carolina: The floor amendment of this budget is painful -- less than totally responsible. We need to trust our committee. This committee has worked hard, agonizing over the cuts. We cannot responsibly micromanage the line items on this budget. I urge you to vote against each and every amendment, which I will do.

Deputy ???: Prefer that these changes be made by the Executive Council.

[End of 10 minute time for discussion of revenues.]

[Vote on Amendment]

Amendment fails.

Now discussing Canonical and Program.

Western Massachusetts: Page 38, 2.0, a single asking shall be applied at the rates of "up to" 21%. Add the words "up to."

In 2003 55 dioceses accepted the full asking.

In 2008 33 dioceses accepted the full asking.

We had to cut our diocesan budget and cut every other part except the pledge to the national church. My biggest concern is the 24 dioceses who have not offered their diocesan reports. We simply don't know what they can provide.

Southeast Florida: Raise question whether this is appropriate at this time, since it deals with revenue. My understanding is that the time had expired.

President: The amendment is out of order.

Jennings, Ohio -- move amendment -- to add 17K per year to line 141 HOD Staff Costs and to fund it by reducing Chief Operating Officer/Strategic Planning. Enables bicameral structure of our polity by asking for a staffing level of two in the HOD staff office -- requested by our President, Bonnie Anderson. Primary voice for this house is our wonderful president. Ensure that she has the tools necessary to represent us as she did so well in this past triennium.

Deputy: It would be difficult for her to continue her work without the proper staff support that she needs. Urge to put back the money necessary to have her office staffed properly.

[Numerous other deputies rising to support the need to add staff for Bonnie Anderson]

Deputy: rise to speak against it as I speak against all amendments to the budget. My own parish has had to go through the same things making these painful decisions.

Deputy: For me this amendment is about polity. As far as I'm concerned we have one unpaid representative. This amendment is asking for staff to do its job. This is the senior house.

Voice vote of amendment -- majority of nays.

[President decides to go with electronic voting.]

Electronic voting shows slim majority of nays. Amendment fails.

Deputy: Moves an amendment to reduce Line 124, Column M by $250,000 and add a line in the budget of $250,000 for "Study to move the Episcopal Church Center out of New York City]

Time we are living in poses many challenges. The Episcopal Church Center in NYC is very expensive.

Deputy: Since 1960 The Episcopal Church has discovered the west. NYC not the geographical center of the US.

Montana Deputy: Supports amendment. It is timely for us to consider pushing for a much more economical place to base our church. A place much more centrally located and one that many of us can call during *our* times of operation.

Move the question.

Amendment fails.

Cole of Colorado: moves to reconsider the amendment to add money to staff of Bonnie Anderson's office.

Parliamentarian: To bring that motion back to the floor requires a 2/3 vote.

Motion fails on voice vote.

President moves to electronic voting.

Motion to reconsider adding funding for Bonnie Anderson's staff fails overwhelmingly.

[11.30 end]


[2.30 p.m.]

[Debating amendment for funding of Episcopal Life]

Deputy: We have committed as a church to telling our story in our own print publication, not allowing other media to tell our story for us.

[Several opposing amendment adding funding to Episcopal Life]

Call the question.

Amendment fails.

Deputy: Move to restore cuts from Mission Funding program by authorizing Executive Council to use $3 million from reserves. I have been the CEO of professional services firm for ??? years. I have never seen the logic in cutting operations people who have already paid for themselves in startup costs.

Deputy Pittsburgh: Call the question.

Amendment fails.

In line 277, restore an allocation of 60K a year for total of 180K to office of women's ministries and charging the wisdom of Executive Council. Need to have coordination to facilitate women's networks.Need someone who I can call for information -- and we need a coordinator of women's ministries.

Call the question.

Motion falls.

Procedural motion -- move to extend debate by 10 minutes.

Motion fails.

Add 240,000 to line item 222 for Total Racial Justice.

We have the mandate to eradicate racism -- and who will do that. Who will talk to the diocesan about doing the anti-racism training? And who will do the training?

Colorado deputy: Urge us to defeat amendment and all other amendments. The Episcopal Church has too many factories producing too many Hummers. We need priests and bicycles.

Deputy ???: Rise in support -- we have a long way to go regarding race.

Amendment defeated.

Rhode Island deputy: Rise to make an amendment.

President: I am sorry but our time is up.

D067 passes.

Fontaine: requests moment of prayer for all the staff that they might find healing and hope in their lives.

Secretary: Special order for consideration of C056.

Committee member: Committee moves adoption of special order.

-- limited to total of 35 minutes
-- committee has 5 minutes to report
-- 5 minutes to respond to questions of clarification
-- speakers limited to 1 minute
-- chair will recognize alternate viewpoints
-- no motion to terminate debate shall be in order before the time limit shall have expired
-- Special order to be heard at 9.30 a.m.

Rusell, San Diego -- why not taking it up this afternoon?

Dispatch -- hoping to get through other legislation to get to junior house

The motion carries.

C056 to be taken up at 9.30 a.m.

[3.06 p.m.]

Defense of Marriage Act -- C023.

Clark: request a vote by orders from Albany and Central Florida

Deputy: We are tearing this church apart -- I urge you to vote this down. Christians of good will can disagree on this.

Gunderson: Our committee saw this as a civil right. Because people cannot take care of themselves and others, this is essential.

Lewis: Everything the church does should be theological. We are putting the horse before the cart. I hope and pray that we would desire balance in this church.

Cole, Colorado: This body and this church has consistently said that we value inclusion for all people. The dispute we have is a theological dispute. Several states have already affirmed that marriage is for everyone. Defense of Marriage acts stand in the way of equal marriage rights for all.

Albany: I chose as an adult to become an Episcopalian because I valued personal conscience. In the past, this house has always supported the freedom of individuals to express their conscience. The majority of this house does support gay rights. Go for it. Get out there. Get involved. This resolution calls on all Episcopalians. Imagine how you would feel if a resolution called for all Episcopalians to vote Republican. Vote no.

Rochester: I am doing what the previous speaker suggested doing. This church has been in support of civil rights and this is a civil rights matter. I am legally married in one jurisdiction but not in the US.

Kelly, Rio Grande -- Support for all people who are children of God. However, this motion seeks to bring two things together that do not belong. One is about civil rights, and the other is about the sanctity of the sacrament of marriage.

Deputy: ?

Deputy: Call the question.

Hawaii deputy: [asks about relation to vote by orders, doctrinal discipline and Title IV discipline concerning marriage vote]

Matters of marriage are doctrinal but are not of Doctrine with a big D -- our doctrine of marriage really means doctrinal with a small d and did not fit with under the term of Doctrine that is subject to Title IV.

[Vote by orders taken -- they have moved on to other matters]

[Discussing B031, Hope for Reconciliation in Honduras]

Charlie Holt, Central Florida: We have a 40 year companion diocese relationship with Honduras -- the longest running companion relationship in the Anglican Communion. I move a substitute resolution -- substituting the original resolution with the exception of the word "coup" that the bishop of Honduras originally submitted with his strong language. I have spoken with him several times and he prefers original language.

Deputy: We are not competent to weigh in on a complex situation like this -- the Episcopal Church is not familiar with the situation in that country. I don't think we have any business in telling the OAS what to say in this matter.

Honduras Deputy -- speak in support of this amendment -- should go in record as being in total opposition of their actions.

Delaware -- move the question on the amendment and main motion

Amendment fails.

California -- move to strike lines 14-17 -- the fourth resolve.

Again, I think it's a great idea to call for dialogue and to commend the process with Costa Rica [???] I don't think we have any business to tell the American Organization of States not to take a stand on their coup.

Holt, Central Florida -- it waters down further what Bishop Allen is trying to accomplish there to keep his diocese at the table with that particular organization and at the table with the country.

Pennsylvania -- question moved.

Amendment fails.

Question on main resolution called.

Resolution passes.

[4.40 p.m.]

President asks HOD to greet deputies of Quincy, Fort Worth, Pittsburgh, and San Joaquin with applause.

[5.07]

[Closing down this thread and moving to the DOMA thread.]
20 Comments • Print-friendlyPrint-friendly w/commentsShare on Facebook
Comments:

Sounds like they have run out of other peoples’ money.

I have been baptised, but not in the name of the Spirit of Ubuntu.

[1] Posted by Pageantmaster on 07-16-2009 at 12:10 PM • top

Deputy: Moves an amendment to add a line in the budget of $250,000 for “Study to move the Episcopal Church Center out of New York City

I think we all can come up with some suggested alternate sites…

[2] Posted by Br_er Rabbit on 07-16-2009 at 12:12 PM • top

Well, once the throng of folks start crashing down the doors of Episcopal churches now that inclusion is complete, there should be no problems.  Can’t they pass a budget on faith?  Begging the question, I know.

Darin+

[3] Posted by frdarin on 07-16-2009 at 12:13 PM • top

Poor Bonnie Anderson. They will spend a lot more on that for lawyer’s fees. These lawsuits are effecting the polity, they need to stop.

[4] Posted by Rocks on 07-16-2009 at 12:24 PM • top

The HOD is the senior house?? I thought that was the HOB. Silly me.

Why does Bonnie Anderson have a job that requires staff when GC is not in session? (rhetorical question)

[5] Posted by monika on 07-16-2009 at 12:39 PM • top

The Bonnie Anderson fan club must not be as large as believed.

[6] Posted by oscewicee on 07-16-2009 at 12:45 PM • top

Please correct me if I am wrong ... but IMHO it seems as if the Pres of the HOD tried twice (with electronic voting) to get a vote to go her way and enhance her office. Is that not a conflict of interest; shouldn’t she have handed her gavel over for those occasions? This is just the thought of a hick west Texas farm boy ... but I am Baptized. 19 Crib

[7] Posted by 19 Crib on 07-16-2009 at 01:06 PM • top

They should move the Episcopal Church Center from the bridge to the stern of the ship.

[8] Posted by paradoxymoron on 07-16-2009 at 01:11 PM • top

Missed opportunity - they should have sold 815 and moved to Mississippi. After all we know the PB likes the family feel of the Magnolia State.

[9] Posted by driver8 on 07-16-2009 at 01:13 PM • top

testing to see if I can post

[10] Posted by Dee in Iowa on 07-16-2009 at 01:19 PM • top

Hey Dee - good to see you on here! 

Darin+

[11] Posted by frdarin on 07-16-2009 at 01:20 PM • top

If they moved to Mississippi, they might catch something from all the Baptists…. Faith.

You know what is really ironic? I have a gay relative, whom I love dearly and whom I would like to bring into the church. He might be tempted to come to TEC based on the church’s policy toward gays - but, and it’s depressing to have to say this, I wouldn’t want him to go because of the *theology*. Or lack of same.

[12] Posted by oscewicee on 07-16-2009 at 01:24 PM • top

Oh…and I thought they would have sold off my former parish’s building by now(after we were kicked out) to fund this round of Ubuntu…or the next court case.  I mean, the building was paid-off and everything.  Surely great liquor-store potential.  Ahhh, but it seems somehow the parish was “reconstituted” just in the nick of time!!!  I am baptized.

[13] Posted by TXThurifer on 07-16-2009 at 01:43 PM • top

The PB&F Proposed budget presented yesterday may be found on the web at

http://www.drop.io/pbfbudgetdraft071509

[14] Posted by TLDillon on 07-16-2009 at 03:02 PM • top

From what I am reading (from somewhere else) the commitment to the Anglican Consultative Council has been cut by 33%.

[15] Posted by TLDillon on 07-16-2009 at 03:08 PM • top

Has pet funerals come up yet?

[16] Posted by driver8 on 07-16-2009 at 04:31 PM • top

Fr. Matt, you have quoted some eloquent speakers above. May their voices be heard.

[17] Posted by oscewicee on 07-16-2009 at 04:44 PM • top

Deputy: Since 1960 The Episcopal Church has discovered the west. NYC not the geographical center of the US.

This guy just doesn’t get it.  NYC is the center of the cultural universe.  Where else should such a culturally relevant organization like TEC locate its center other than in the midst of all those other culturally relevant people?  If TEC moved to Peoria, how could it influence the movers and the shakers?  How would it shape the destiny of mankind?  Where would it find a decent bottle of wine to go with dinner?  My gracious, someone might even have to eat at Perkins.

carl

[18] Posted by carl on 07-16-2009 at 06:42 PM • top

#5- In point of fact, the HoD is the senior house, as in the formative stages of the US church, there were no US bishops, and at the time of the adoption of the first constitution, I think only Seabury had been recently consecrated by some Scottish non-juror bishops who performed a border crossing into the territory of the Bishop of London (who had jurisdiction in the colonial churches), and White and others would follow shortly after, after consecration by CoE.  TEC broke away from CoE and stole all the US property of the Bishop of London, including Falls Church and Trinity Wall Street.  Of course, TEC doesn’t look at TEC’s history that way.  But there are some interesting parallels between the formation of TEC and the formation of ACNA, although the former was more a matter of political necessity, the latter a matter of theological necessity.

[19] Posted by tjmcmahon on 07-16-2009 at 06:56 PM • top

“...a holy estate, instituted by God,...” is doctrine with a small “d”?  What, pray tell, would constitute Doctrine with a big “D”?

[20] Posted by tjmcmahon on 07-16-2009 at 07:13 PM • top

Registered members are welcome to leave comments. Log in here, or register here.


Comment Policy: We pride ourselves on having some of the most open, honest debate anywhere about the crisis in our church. However, we do have a few rules that we enforce strictly. They are: No over-the-top profanity, no racial or ethnic slurs, and no threats real or implied of physical violence. Please see this post for more. Although we rarely do so, we reserve the right to remove or edit comments, as well as suspend users' accounts, solely at the discretion of site administrators. Since we try to err on the side of open debate, you may sometimes see comments that you believe strain the boundaries of our rules. Comments are the opinions of visitors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Stand Firm, its board of directors, or its site administrators.